I finally got around to seeing this movie. I was pretty excited when it first came out. Even though Oliver Stone is, well, Oliver Stone, as long as one keeps in perspective the liberal slant his movies take, they are enjoyable (to me anyway). I am not a fan of former President George W. Bush, and I’m not ashamed to say that. I think his presidency was absolutely miserable. But this isn’t about that. The movie…
I wasn’t expecting an action-packed thriller or anything, but it moved at too slow of a pace for me. But, that’s typical Oliver Stone, so I’ll give it a pass on that part. Overall I still wasn’t impressed by the film.
The biggest drawback was the caricature-like portrayal of some of the players. The portrayal of Condoleezza Rice was something I would expect to see on SNL – forced and distracting. Colin Powell, Karl Rove and Ari Fleischer fall into the same category. Rumsfeld was kind of humorous, but it went too far on the “clueless” angle…at least one hopes it was too far. It was almost as though the actors were doing impressions more than acting. I think that actually detracted from otherwise solid performances with the W., Cheney, Barbara Bush and Laura Bush portrayals.
It’s too bad because I really did have high hopes for the movie.
Jennifer and I watched a movie called Thirteen last night. This is definitely not just another teen movie. It was written by one of the stars of the movie (who happens to only by 18 years old) and is very autobiographical in nature. It’s the story of an innocent 13 year old who gets caught up in being one of the "cool kids" at school and spirals downward on a horrible ride. This isn’t like an After School Special. The stuff these kids get into – sex, drugs, self mutilation – is scary as hell. I have a 5 year old daughter…I pray I don’t have that to look forward to!
If you’re looking for a drama that makes you say, "wow" check out Thirteen. Meanwhile I’ll go look for a brainless Adam Sandler comedy to go watch. That’s much more entertaining.
A friend of mine recently posted on his blog that he and his wife just got a minivan. In writing about it, Fred points out how "conforming" (buying a minivan) actually is rebellion since today is the day of SUV’s for soccer mom’s. Minivans are so 1998 and therefore, cool again in a non-conforming, rage against the machine kind of way. Ok, Fred was kidding (sort of) with the post. But it got me thinking…
Is "conforming" really an uncool, bad thing?
I’m not convinced it is, ’cause, well, if it is, then I’m way not cool. I am proud to state the following about this average guy:
I’m sure there are a thousand more examples. I guess what I’m saying is, I can like the same mainstream things that the majority of people like and not be a dork. "Conforming" does not mean uncool. If it does then, well, I’m proudly uncool.