I alluded before to some of my questions surrounding Christianity. Specifically, the exclusive nature of it (the only way to salvation) and the circular reasoning behind citing Biblical explanations as truth weigh on me. Why do people who identify themselves as Christians think they are the only ones on the right path and everyone else is wrong?!
I took a “History of Christianity” course as an elective when I was in college. I went to a secular state university and was the biggest voice of evangelical Christianity in the room. At the time, it used to bug the crap out of me how critical people were about Christianity (and even Christians themselves). I fought them tooth and nail on it, citing Biblical reference along the way…Especially those feminist theologians in the class! They were really out there!
I earned the A, but I also took a lot of “things that make me go ‘hmm’” from it.
In that course we read books by a guy named Marcus Borg (among others). At the time I viewed him as a heretic. Who can call themselves a Christian while holding such a counter-populist view?! As I’ve gotten older (and I guess more open to questioning things), I find myself relating more to Borg’s line of thinking. The Bible scholars I know kind of poo-poo Borg because he’s a bit old school and not fresh or on the “cutting edge” of critical Biblical scholarship. But, I am actually finding some peace in some of his thinking…Or, my own expansion and definitions based on Borg’s thinking.
Metaphorical Jesus.
I used this term a few months ago when thinking through my, well, thinking on the subject. While it would be a cool name for a band, I think it is also at the heart of the faith I’m coming to own.
Borg calls it “pre-Easter” and “post-Easter” Jesus…The Jesus experienced prior to the resurrection by his followers is distinct from the mystical deity of Jesus after the resurrection. I prefer to think of it in terms of the metaphor…The Metaphorical Jesus.
What do I mean? I’ll throw it right out there. I don’t believe that the man who walked the earth 2000 years ago, Jesus of Nazareth, was our route to salvation.
GAHHH!!! My parents are having heart attacks!!! Wait, let me explain.
As my previous “Questioning Christianity” post mentioned, I struggle with the “smallness” of what the guy in Nazareth was about. The reach of his ministry was limited. The ministry itself – as described in the Bible – is/was very Israelite-centric. There’s a whole world (universe?!) out there that the 30 year ministry of the man, Jesus, never touched. I don’t buy it. And yeah, those are my eyes rolling when I think of one group of people saying they are the chosen ones and everyone else isn’t.
Instead, I keep honing in on Jesus as the “word made flesh.” To me, that indicates it’s the word that is the key God has sent, not the flesh. The word describes the way God wants us to be. In this view, “Jesus” is not a person, but a concept or an ideal. “Jesus” means word or way of God. Following the word or way of God leads to salvation. That I can get in line with.
In this thinking, Jesus of Nazareth was a vessel through which Jesus – the way of God – reached people. Some people. The people in the time and place context of Jesus of Nazareth’s ministry. That word and way of God is and was perfect. The one who created us has a way he wants us to live among one another and in relation to him. That’s easy. I am arguing he communicated his “Jesus” through a guy named Jesus.
This also opens the door for God communicating, teaching, revealing himself and offering salvation to others outside of the Middle East 2000 years ago. Was Muhammad a vessel through which “Jesus” – the way of God – reached Islamic people? Was the Buddha that vessel to people in Nepal? What about Ganesh to the people in India? Maybe even Gaia to the Greeks and later *gasp* “pagans”. Others? I think it’s possible though I don’t really know.
It sounds weird to say insert-prophet/teacher-name-here may have been a “Jesus” because we keep picturing the guy with the beard, flowing hair and white robe. Defining “Jesus” as a concept – the definition of the word and way of God – solves that for me. That satisfies me such that I can identify myself as one who follows the word and way of the Creator. Period. And I define that word and way of the Creator using the term “Jesus.”
Metaphorical Jesus. I can buy that.
